but that what i said with "I know what you mean". Well yes but both his monitors he asked about are 1080p monitors and you measure the vertical pixel not the horizontal. A 1366 x 768 screen has less desktop space to work, it will not be a problem if you just want to watch Youtube videos, however for programming or any type of creative work, a Full HD screen is a much better. Why 16:9 (or even 21:9) models so widely used? Reason is simple - they have less matrix area and consequentally they are cheaper to manufacture. Thus, if your 15’6 laptop has a 1920×1080 screen, there are twice as many pixels compared to a 1366×768 screen on a 15’6 laptop. Because of that professional monitors nowadays often has 4:3 or even 1:1 aspect ratio. We should compare monitors with the same diagonal size.Īnd 16:9 will lose - its square will be about 7% less. I can use the same logic again: if both are 1920 then you will see more on the top and bottom of 4:3 because both have the same width (really both statement are wrong - yours and this one).īut such comparison also incorrect. With the aid of our resizer image to 1920x1080 dimensions tool, it is possible to resize images in pixels without losing their quality. Resize image to any dimension Upload image to resize it to 1920x1080 pixels. you only see up and downwards more at 1080p on 4:3 when you start to zoom out but that also could apply to a 16:9. To resize image for 1920 x 1080 pixels CHOOSE FILE. Originally posted by tacoshy:well I know what you mean but if both is 1080p then you see more to the sides of the 16:9 then on a 4:3 as both have the exact height.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |